13 min read

Elevating User Satisfaction: The Art of Balancing Synchronous and Asynchronous Processes

Elevating User Satisfaction: The Art of Balancing Synchronous and Asynchronous Processes
Photo by Michael Dziedzic / Unsplash

Mobile banking apps have gained immense popularity as a convenient means for customers to manage their finances on the go. With users relying heavily on their smartphones to access bank accounts, perform transactions, and check balances, the responsiveness of these apps is paramount. Any delays or interruptions in performance can quickly lead to frustration and potential loss of business.

A comprehensive study conducted by Compuware revealed that a staggering 79% of customers who encounter performance issues with mobile banking apps are likely to abandon the app and never return. Considering the critical nature of mobile banking, developers must prioritize the optimization of system responsiveness to meet the high expectations of their customers.

To achieve optimal system responsiveness, developers are increasingly embracing the synchronous/asynchronous approach. This approach involves categorizing processes into synchronous and asynchronous components, allowing developers to focus on optimizing each type of process individually. Within the synchronous part, further division can be made into two sub-parts: processes requiring user input or feedback, and processes that can run in the background once the user has received a response. This approach empowers users to continue using the app seamlessly while asynchronous processes operate in the background, delivering a smoother and more efficient user experience.

Synchronous processes encompass activities such as requesting balance updates, initiating transactions, or seeking customer support. These processes demand immediate user interaction and necessitate fast response times to meet user expectations. On the other hand, asynchronous processes involve tasks like sending transaction confirmation emails, processing statements, or conducting risk assessments. These processes do not require immediate user interaction and can be executed in the background without impacting the user experience.

By categorizing processes into synchronous and asynchronous, developers can dedicate efforts to optimize each process type individually. Synchronous processes can be fine-tuned to deliver quick response times and real-time user feedback, while asynchronous processes can be optimized for efficient resource utilization and scalability. Consequently, this approach yields faster response times, optimized resource allocation, and an overall superior user experience.

One technology that proves particularly valuable in implementing asynchronous processing is a pub/sub infrastructure like Apache Kafka. Pub/sub infrastructure offers a scalable, reliable, and fault-tolerant mechanism for facilitating asynchronous communication between different components of the application. However, it is important to note that the categorization of processes into synchronous and asynchronous components will vary based on the specific requirements of the app and the preferences of the users.

By leveraging the synchronous/asynchronous approach, mobile banking app developers can optimize responsiveness and cater to the high standards expected by their customers. This not only enhances user satisfaction but also helps retain customers, reduce abandonment rates, and ultimately contribute to the success of the mobile banking app in a highly competitive market.

Implementation of the Synchronous/Asynchronous Approach for Enhanced System Responsiveness

To enhance system responsiveness and improve user experience, modern developers are increasingly adopting the synchronous/asynchronous approach. This approach involves categorizing processes into synchronous and asynchronous parts, allowing for targeted optimization of each process type. In this section, we will delve into the implementation of this approach to provide a comprehensive understanding.

Identifying Synchronous and Asynchronous Processes

The initial step in implementing the synchronous/asynchronous approach is to identify the synchronous and asynchronous processes within the application. Synchronous processes demand immediate user interaction, while asynchronous processes can run in the background without disrupting the user experience. It is essential for developers to thoroughly analyze the application's functionality and determine the nature of each process.

Identifying synchronous processes entails examining the segments of the application that necessitate real-time user interaction. For example, a balance update request might require immediate user input to select the account, whereas sending a transaction confirmation email can be accomplished asynchronously. Similarly, a customer support request might require prompt user feedback, while conducting a risk assessment can be performed in the background.

On the other hand, identifying asynchronous processes involves pinpointing the parts of the application that can operate in the background without impacting the user experience. These processes generally do not require immediate user interaction and can be executed when the user is not actively engaged with the application. Examples of asynchronous processes include processing statements, sending transaction confirmation emails, or performing risk assessments, all of which can be efficiently conducted in the background.

Once the synchronous and asynchronous processes have been identified, developers can proceed with categorizing these processes to optimize them individually. By segregating processes into these two distinct categories, developers can concentrate their efforts on optimizing each process type independently. This approach results in improved response times, better utilization of system resources, and an overall enhanced user experience.

It is important to note that the classification of processes into synchronous and asynchronous categories may not always be straightforward. Some processes might require immediate user input but can be executed in the background once the necessary input is obtained. Developers must carefully analyze each process and determine the most suitable approach to dividing it into synchronous and asynchronous parts.

Furthermore, the classification of processes into synchronous and asynchronous categories should be based on the specific requirements of the application and the user's needs. Developers should invest time in comprehending how the application will be utilized and how users will interact with it to determine the most effective way to implement the synchronous/asynchronous approach.

Optimizing Synchronous Processes with the Two-Sub-Part Approach

In the realm of software development, the efficient management of synchronous processes is crucial for delivering a seamless user experience. By adopting the two-sub-part approach, developers can streamline these processes by dividing them into two distinct components: one that necessitates immediate user input or feedback, and another that can run independently in the background once the user has received a response. This approach enables users to continue interacting with the application while asynchronous tasks operate behind the scenes, resulting in enhanced efficiency and a smoother user journey.

To implement the two-sub-part approach effectively, developers can leverage techniques such as message passing and event-driven programming. For instance, employing an event-driven strategy might involve sending a message to a designated queue when a balance update is requested, and subsequently executing the actual update process in the background once the message has been received.

The first sub-part of synchronous processes requires prompt user interaction and commonly involves displaying information or soliciting feedback. Examples of such processes include requesting a balance update, initiating a transaction, or seeking customer support. The swift response times associated with this sub-part are critical to ensure user satisfaction and prevent frustration.

Conversely, the second sub-part of synchronous processes encompasses tasks that can be executed in the background after the user has received a response. This category encompasses activities such as updating an account balance following a completed transaction or sending a confirmation email. Since this sub-part does not necessitate immediate user interaction, it can be executed inconspicuously, thereby preserving the user experience.

The provided sequence diagram illustrates how an application can handle synchronous processes by employing the two-sub-part approach. The process commences with the user initiating a request within the application. If the process demands user interaction, the application promptly executes it and returns the result to the user. Alternatively, if the process can be performed in the background, the application submits the task to a message queue and continues to handle other tasks concurrently.

While progressing with other tasks, the application periodically checks the message queue for pending tasks. Upon detecting a task, the application executes it in the background and subsequently notifies the message queue to remove the task from the queue once it is completed.

Adopting this approach provides several advantages, including effective task management and mitigated risks of incomplete tasks resulting from system errors. Furthermore, the utilization of a message queue enables any available instance of the application to pick up tasks, enhancing efficiency and scalability. In summary, the two-sub-part approach empowers applications to handle both immediate and non-immediate user requests efficiently, ultimately resulting in an enhanced user experience.


When implementing the two-sub-part approach for synchronous processes, it is imperative to consider the specific requirements of the application and the user's needs. Developers should meticulously analyze each synchronous process and determine the optimal division into two sub-parts to optimize system responsiveness and enhance the user experience.

Additionally, developers should select suitable tools and frameworks to facilitate the implementation of the two-sub-part approach. Utilizing tools such as message passing and event-driven programming simplifies the communication between different parts of the application. Employing these tools streamlines the implementation of the two-sub-part approach, empowering developers to optimize synchronous processes for fast response times and real-time user feedback.

Optimizing Synchronous and Asynchronous Processes Separately

In today's fast-paced business environment, optimizing processes is crucial to ensure optimal performance and deliver a superior user experience. One effective approach is to divide processes into synchronous and asynchronous categories and optimize them separately. By doing so, businesses can focus on enhancing response times and real-time user feedback for synchronous processes, while improving resource utilization and scalability for asynchronous processes. This article explores the benefits of optimizing each process type individually and offers valuable insights for businesses seeking to maximize their system responsiveness and user satisfaction.

To optimize synchronous processes, businesses should prioritize minimizing response times and ensuring real-time user feedback. This entails streamlining database queries, optimizing API calls, and reducing network latency. By minimizing response times, businesses can prevent user frustration and provide immediate feedback, thereby enhancing the overall user experience.

On the other hand, optimizing asynchronous processes involves efficient resource utilization and scalability. Leveraging cloud computing resources, adopting distributed systems, and implementing batch processing are effective strategies in this regard. By optimizing asynchronous processes, businesses can handle large volumes of data and scale their operations to meet user demand effectively.

It's important to note that optimizing synchronous and asynchronous processes separately can sometimes involve trade-offs. For instance, optimizing synchronous processes for faster response times might increase resource utilization, potentially impacting the efficiency of asynchronous processes. Similarly, optimizing asynchronous processes for efficient resource utilization might result in longer response times, affecting the user experience. Striking the right balance between these trade-offs is essential for businesses to deliver the best possible user experience.

Moreover, businesses should continuously monitor and analyze system performance to identify areas for further optimization. Key performance metrics such as response times, error rates, and resource utilization provide valuable insights into system performance and highlight opportunities for improvement. By consistently monitoring and analyzing these metrics, businesses can ensure their applications meet the high standards expected by their customers.

Leveraging Pub/Sub Infrastructure for Enhanced Asynchronous Processing

One effective approach to optimize asynchronous processes is by leveraging a pub/sub infrastructure. A pub/sub infrastructure facilitates the seamless exchange of messages between various components of an application. By adopting a pub/sub infrastructure, businesses can decouple application components and enable efficient asynchronous processing.

Pub/sub infrastructures offer a flexible and scalable solution for handling asynchronous processes. Instead of developing custom code to manage asynchronous processing, businesses can rely on the pub/sub infrastructure to handle message exchange between components. This saves development time and allows developers to focus on other critical aspects of the application.

Additionally, pub/sub infrastructures enhance system scalability by enabling parallel processing of messages. By leveraging a pub/sub infrastructure, businesses can distribute messages to multiple workers, ensuring efficient resource utilization and scalability. This becomes particularly valuable in mobile banking apps where large volumes of data generated by users need to be processed effectively.

Another advantage of pub/sub infrastructures is their ability to provide fault-tolerant and reliable message processing. Techniques such as message replication and acknowledgment ensure that messages are processed even in the event of failures, improving overall application reliability and performance.

When adopting a pub/sub infrastructure for asynchronous processing, it's crucial to consider the specific requirements of the application and user needs. Businesses should select a pub/sub infrastructure that aligns with their scalability, fault tolerance, and reliability needs. Additionally, designing the message exchange process carefully to optimize it for the specific use case is vital.

Apache Kafka is a popular pub/sub infrastructure well-suited for asynchronous processing. It offers scalability and fault tolerance, making it ideal for handling real-time

data in large volumes—making it an excellent choice for mobile banking apps and similar demanding applications.

Advantages of the Synchronous/Asynchronous Approach for Business Applications

The adoption of a synchronous/asynchronous approach in business applications offers significant advantages that enhance the overall user experience, expedite response times, and optimize resource allocation. In this section, we will delve into these advantages in more detail, accompanied by practical examples illustrating their application in various use cases.

Enhanced User Experience

The synchronous/asynchronous approach plays a crucial role in elevating the user experience, particularly in business applications such as mobile banking. By strategically dividing processes into synchronous and asynchronous components, developers can empower users to continue interacting with the application seamlessly while background processes run efficiently. This design philosophy ensures a smoother and more productive user experience by eliminating the need for users to wait for processes to finalize before proceeding.

For instance, in mobile banking apps, the synchronous/asynchronous approach can be utilized to process transactions. By segregating the transaction process into synchronous and asynchronous stages, developers can deliver immediate feedback on transaction status to users while allowing background processes like balance updates and email confirmations to execute concurrently. Consequently, this approach greatly enhances the user experience, as users can continue utilizing the app without disruptions caused by waiting for these secondary processes to complete.

Accelerated Response Times

Implementing the synchronous/asynchronous approach also contributes to significantly faster response times. By optimizing synchronous processes to deliver rapid responses and real-time feedback, developers ensure that users receive immediate updates, reducing potential frustrations and enhancing user satisfaction.

Consider the scenario of balance updates within a business application. By partitioning the balance update process into two distinct components, developers can offer users instant feedback on the status of the update, while concurrently executing the actual update process in the background. This approach not only expedites response times but also enhances the overall user experience, enabling uninterrupted app usage without requiring users to wait for the completion of the update process.

Efficient Resource Utilization

A key advantage of the synchronous/asynchronous approach lies in its ability to optimize resource utilization, leading to improved scalability and management of data-intensive operations. By designing asynchronous processes for optimal resource allocation and scalability, developers ensure that business applications can effectively handle substantial volumes of data and seamlessly scale processes to meet user demand.

A prime example illustrating the achievement of efficient resource utilization through the synchronous/asynchronous approach is the utilization of batch processing. By adopting an asynchronous approach to batch processing, developers can distribute processing tasks across multiple workers, thereby maximizing resource utilization and significantly reducing processing times. This allows business applications to handle large data sets efficiently, resulting in enhanced performance and responsiveness.

In conclusion, the synchronous/asynchronous approach offers substantial benefits when applied to business applications. Through an enhanced user experience, faster response times, and efficient resource utilization, this approach optimizes the overall performance and scalability of applications, ultimately contributing to improved customer satisfaction and successful business operations.

Comparing the Synchronous/Asynchronous Approach with Event-Driven Architecture (EDA)

In the realm of mobile banking apps, optimizing system responsiveness is crucial. Two popular techniques for achieving this are the synchronous/asynchronous approach and event-driven architecture (EDA). EDA involves designing the application around events or messages that trigger specific actions, allowing for asynchronous handling of processes. This approach offers several advantages, including improved scalability, fault tolerance, and reliability.

One key benefit of EDA is its ability to enhance scalability by distributing processing across multiple workers. By decoupling components, EDA also improves fault tolerance and reliability, as failures in one component do not impact the operation of others. However, implementing EDA can be more complex than the synchronous/asynchronous approach, requiring specialized expertise in designing message exchanges between different components. Moreover, EDA may not be ideal for all mobile banking apps, particularly those that necessitate immediate user interaction, as the asynchronous approach does not provide real-time feedback.

It's important to note that implementing EDA requires all processes to be handled asynchronously, including synchronous processes. A common technique is to wrap synchronous processes asynchronously, allowing users to continue using the app while the asynchronous process runs in the background, resulting in a smoother and more efficient user experience. Nonetheless, utilizing an asynchronous wrapper involves status polling, which introduces potential risks to the system.

As depicted in the above sequence diagram, EDA necessitates polling to simulate synchronous processes, posing potential risks to the system. If the process fails to receive the "done" status, it can hang indefinitely, leading to system errors or crashes. The consequences of a hung process are significant—it ties up system resources, resulting in increased system load and reduced performance. Moreover, it can create a backlog of unprocessed tasks, causing other processes to back up and potentially leading to additional system errors or crashes.

If a critical process hangs, it can cause the entire system to fail, resulting in downtime and potential damage to the business's reputation. Resolving the issue and restoring system functionality may require manual intervention, which is both time-consuming and costly. In some cases, a complete system reboot might be necessary, leading to data loss and extended periods of downtime.


After carefully considering the benefits and challenges associated with the synchronous/asynchronous approach and event-driven architecture (EDA), it is evident that both techniques possess distinct strengths and weaknesses. Developers must thoroughly analyze their specific requirements and user needs to determine the most suitable approach.

While EDA offers advantages such as scalability and fault tolerance, its implementation demands specialized expertise and may not be the optimal choice for all mobile banking apps. Conversely, the synchronous/asynchronous approach is simpler and more suitable for real-time feedback but may not be as efficient in handling significant data volumes or tasks.

To optimize the benefits of both approaches, a hybrid strategy can be employed. For instance, implementing an asynchronous wrapper around synchronous processes in EDA allows users to continue using the app while the asynchronous process runs in the background, resulting in a smoother and more efficient user experience. However, it is crucial to acknowledge the risks associated with status polling in EDA, such as process hang and the subsequent negative impact on system performance and user experience.

Ultimately, the best approach is one that optimizes the specific system requirements and unique circumstances. Developers should prioritize system optimization rather than blindly adhering to a particular framework or technique. By meticulously analyzing the system's needs and user expectations, developers can design an optimal system that delivers an exceptional user experience while ensuring scalability, reliability, and fault tolerance.

Conclusion

Mobile banking apps have become immensely popular as a means for individuals to effectively manage their finances. In order to meet the high expectations of customers, developers must prioritize system responsiveness. This necessitates the adoption of the synchronous/asynchronous approach, which involves dividing processes into synchronous and asynchronous components.

The implementation of the synchronous/asynchronous approach entails identifying synchronous and asynchronous processes, utilizing a two-part approach for synchronous processes, and optimizing synchronous and asynchronous processes independently. Striking the right balance is crucial for developers to ensure that the app delivers an exceptional user experience.

One valuable technology that aids in implementing asynchronous processing is a pub/sub infrastructure such as Apache Kafka. A pub/sub infrastructure offers a scalable, reliable, and fault-tolerant mechanism for managing asynchronous communication between different sections of the application.

The synchronous/asynchronous approach brings forth numerous advantages that can enhance the user experience, facilitate faster response times, and enable efficient resource utilization. Specifically, it significantly improves the user experience by allowing users to continue using the app while asynchronous processes run in the background. Moreover, it optimizes synchronous processes for rapid response times and real-time user feedback, leading to quicker response times. Lastly, it optimizes asynchronous processes for efficient resource utilization and scalability, resulting in improved resource management.

In conclusion, the synchronous/asynchronous approach is a powerful tool for developers of mobile banking apps to enhance system responsiveness and provide an exceptional user experience. By segregating processes into synchronous and asynchronous components and optimizing them separately, developers can meet the demanding expectations of their customers and gain a competitive edge in an increasingly fierce market.